Review Article

Levosimendan, a Promising Pharmacotherapy in Cardiogenic Shock: A Comprehensive Review

Register or Login to View PDF Permissions
Permissions× For commercial reprint enquiries please contact Springer Healthcare: ReprintsWarehouse@springernature.com.

For permissions and non-commercial reprint enquiries, please visit Copyright.com to start a request.

For author reprints, please email rob.barclay@radcliffe-group.com.
Information image

  • Views: 986

  • Likes: 1

  • Downloads: 78

  • Read time: 24m 33s
Average (ratings)
No ratings
Your rating

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a critical condition with high mortality rate, as the current management of CS presents significant challenges. Exploration of more effective therapies is necessitated. This review article comprehensively examines the efficacy and safety of levosimendan in the management of CS. By synthesising evidence from numerous studies, a comparison of levosimendan over traditional inotropic agents, such as enoximone, dobutamine, dopamine and norepinephrine, is highlighted. The unique mechanism of action of levosimendan enhances myocardial contractility without increasing oxygen demand, offering a promising alternative for patients with CS. This review also delves into comparative studies that demonstrate the superiority of levosimendan in improving survival rates, haemodynamic parameters, and reducing the incidence of CS complications. Safety profiles and adverse effects are critically assessed to provide a balanced view of the therapeutic window provided by levosimendan. The review concludes that levosimendan is a valuable addition to the therapeutic strategy against CS, with the potential to improve patient outcomes.

Keywords

Levosimendan, calcium sensitiser, adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium channel opener, cardiogenic shock, cardiovascular disease,

Disclosure:The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Received:

Accepted:

Published online:

DOI:https://doi.org/10.15420/ecr.2024.16

Author contributions:

Conceptualisation: H Susilo, FMA, CDKW, MYA, H Sutanto; data curation: H Susilo, FMA; formal analysis: H Susilo, FMA, CECZM; investigation: H Susilo, FMA, CDKW, MYA, H Sutanto, CECZM; methodology: H Susilo, FMA, CDKW, MYA, H Sutanto; project administration: H Susilo; software: FMA; supervision: H Susilo, CDKW, MYA, H Sutanto; validation: H Susilo, CDKW, MYA, H Sutanto, CECZM; visualisation: FMA, CECZM; writing – original draft preparation: H Susilo, FMA, CDKW, MYA, H Sutanto, CECZM; writing – review & editing: H Susilo, FMA, CDKW, MYA, H Sutanto, CECZM.

Correspondence Details:Hendri Susilo, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60132, Indonesia. E: hendrisusilo@staf.unair.ac.id

Open Access:

This work is open access under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License which allows users to copy, redistribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work is cited correctly.

Cardiogenic Shock Definition, Classification and Pathophysiology

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a critical condition in which the vital organs receive insufficient blood flow due to primary cardiac dysfunction, typically following acute MI, heart failure (HF) exacerbation, or myocarditis. It results from severe myocardial performance reduction, leading to decreased cardiac output, end-organ hypoperfusion, and hypoxia.1–3 The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) classification system standardises the severity of CS and guides treatment strategies (Figure 1). The classification spans from stages A to E, ranging from patients at risk of developing CS to those in the most severe state. Stage A patients are ‘at risk’ of developing CS but do not exhibit signs of hypoperfusion or organ dysfunction. Stage B patients (‘beginning’) have begun to exhibit early signs of CS, such as hypotension (defined as a systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) or tachycardia, without evidence of hypoperfusion or end-organ damage. Early intervention is crucial to prevent deterioration. Stage C (‘classic’) is characterised by hypotension with evidence of organ hypoperfusion, such as altered mental status, cool extremities, oliguria, or elevated lactate levels. Patients require pharmacological or mechanical support to maintain blood pressure and cardiac output. Stage D patients (‘deteriorating’) exhibit worsening signs of shock despite initial resuscitative efforts. They have persistent hypoperfusion and may require more aggressive support, such as high-dose vasopressors or mechanical circulatory support devices (e.g. intra-aortic balloon pump, ventricular assist devices). Finally, Stage E (‘Extremis’) is the most severe stage of CS, where patients are in refractory shock with critical hypoperfusion and multiple organ failure, even cardiac arrest, despite maximal interventions. Survival chances are significantly reduced, and treatment often involves advanced life support and consideration for emergent mechanical circulatory support or even cardiac transplantation.4–6

Figure 1: Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Shock Classification Pyramid

Article image
Download

CS pathophysiology involves a vicious cycle of decreased myocardial contractility, systolic and diastolic ventricular dysfunction, systemic hypoperfusion, and subsequent further cardiac and multiorgan dysfunction.3,7,8 CS often results from acute MI, where a substantial portion of the myocardium is damaged, impairing the heart’s pumping ability. The reduced cardiac output leads to systemic hypoperfusion, initiating a series of compensatory mechanisms, including sympathetic nervous system activation, which increases heart rate and myocardial oxygen demand, and the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) activation, which causes fluid retention and increases preload. However, these compensations may further strain the heart and exacerbate myocardial ischaemia. The resultant low blood pressure and decreased coronary artery perfusion pressure lead to worsening myocardial ischaemia, creating a vicious cycle that further diminishes cardiac output and leads to multisystem organ failure. The decreased perfusion results in anaerobic metabolism and lactic acidosis, which then contributes to the high mortality rate.8,9

Current standard treatments for CS focus on restoring haemodynamic stability using inotropic agents, vasopressors, mechanical circulatory support devices (e.g. intra-aortic balloon pump) and revascularisation if necessary. However, these treatments have limitations. Inotropics and vasopressors can increase myocardial oxygen demand and may lead to arrhythmias and increased mortality.10 Mechanical support devices are associated with significant complications, such as bleeding and thrombosis, and are not universally available.11

Overview of Levosimendan

Levosimendan is a calcium sensitiser and adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium (KATP) channel opener that improves myocardial contractility without significantly increasing intracellular calcium levels and oxygen demand. Unlike traditional inotropes, levosimendan enhances the sensitivity of cardiac troponin C (cTnC) to calcium, leading to a positive inotropic effect. Additionally, its vasodilatory action reduces both preload and afterload, potentially improving cardiac output and reducing myocardial workload. Levosimendan also exhibits anti-inflammatory and cardioprotective effects, offering advantages over conventional therapies (Figure 2).12,13

Figure 2: Mechanisms of Action of Levosimendan

Article image
Download

Furthermore, in vitro levosimendan is a highly selective phosphodiesterase 3 (PDE3) inhibitor.14,15 Nonetheless, this effect becomes significant only at higher doses than those used therapeutically, suggesting its primary mechanism of action is related to calcium sensitisation rather than PDE3 inhibition.16 Levosimendan is currently indicated for patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF).17 In recent years, levosimendan has been a focus of numerous clinical trials.18 Studies have suggested its potential in CS, right ventricular failure, septic shock and other conditions that require inotropic support.19,20 This review aims to critically evaluate the efficacy and safety of levosimendan in CS management. Evidence is synthesised from recent studies, focusing on its impact on haemodynamic improvement, survival rates and clinical outcomes compared to standard treatments. This review also provides the role of levosimendan along with its practical use in the daily management of CS and identifies potential areas for future research.

Pharmacological Profile and Mechanisms of Action of Levosimendan

Levosimendan is a pharmacological agent with dual actions: it serves as a calcium sensitiser and opens KATP channels. Its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are characterised by a rapid onset and a prolonged effect, despite its relatively short plasma half-life (about 1 hour), owing to its active metabolites, OR-1896. The pharmacokinetics of levosimendan (summarised in Table 1) exhibit linearity within a therapeutic dosage range from 0.05 μg/kg/min to 0.2 μg/kg/min. Upon initiating IV infusion, therapeutic levels are typically attained around 1 hour later, with steady state achieved within 5 hours of continuous infusion. However, its effects are prolonged due to its metabolites, especially OR-1896, which possesses a significantly longer elimination half-life of 70–80 hours in patients with HF. The distribution volume for levosimendan is around 0.3 l/kg and exhibits a direct proportionality with a person’s body weight.

Table 1: Summary of Pharmacokinetic Profile of Levosimendan

Article image
Download

Levosimendan is predominantly bound to plasma proteins, with albumin being the main protein, accounting for 97–98% of its binding. The bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of levosimendan are affected by the formulation, with conventional tablets and capsules showing higher bioavailability compared to slow-release formulations.

Levosimendan is mainly excreted through the small intestine and the kidneys after being metabolised into active and inactive metabolites. The process involves its reduction by intestinal bacteria to an amino phenolpyridazinone metabolite (OR-1855), which is further metabolised through acetylation to the N-acetylated conjugate OR-1896. The active metabolite OR-1896, which contributes to the prolonged haemodynamic effects of levosimendan, is formed slowly, with its maximum concentrations typically observed around 2 days after stopping a 24-hour infusion of levosimendan. While the primary route of levosimendan metabolism involves gut bacteria, the liver also plays a role. However, specific details on the involvement of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes are less clear.14,21,22 Following a 24-hour infusion of levosimendan, the pharmacodynamic effect persists for a minimum of 1 week.14

Pharmacodynamically, levosimendan enhances myocardial contractility through calcium sensitisation of cTnC without increasing intracellular calcium concentration, avoiding excessive oxygen consumption. Initially, levosimendan binds to cTnC in a calcium-dependent manner. The binding occurs specifically at the N-terminal domain of cTnC, which is crucial for calcium-induced conformational changes that allow actin-myosin cross-bridge cycling and thus muscle contraction. By stabilising the calcium-bound state of cTnC, levosimendan enhances the sensitivity of the heart muscle to calcium. The interaction between levosimendan and cTnC stabilises the complex of cTnC with calcium, prolonging the time calcium remains bound to cTnC. This action enhances the contractile process by making more effective use of the calcium that enters the myocardial cells during each cardiac cycle, leading to stronger contractions without the need for additional calcium. By increasing the calcium sensitivity of the heart muscle, levosimendan effectively increases the force of cardiac muscle contraction under conditions where calcium concentration would not normally be sufficient to produce such a strong response. This is particularly beneficial in heart failure, where the heart’s ability to contract effectively is compromised. Unlike other inotropic agents that increase intracellular calcium levels, possibly leading to detrimental effects such as arrhythmias and increased oxygen demand, levosimendan achieves its positive inotropic effect without increasing intracellular calcium concentrations. This results in an improved contractile function with less risk of calcium overload and subsequent cardiac dysfunction. Despite its effects on systolic function, levosimendan does not impair diastolic relaxation as the decay of calcium transient takes place prior to the peak contraction and the beginning of relaxation. The mechanism ensures that while contractions are stronger, the relaxation phase of the cardiac cycle is not negatively affected, maintaining overall cardiac efficiency and function.23–25

Levosimendan also induces vasodilation, leading to reduced preload and afterload. This effect is attained through several mechanisms, primarily involving the opening of KATP channels in vascular smooth muscle cells. When these channels are opened, potassium ions flow out of the cells, leading to hyperpolarisation of the cell membrane. This hyperpolarisation prevents the opening of voltage-dependent calcium channels, thereby reducing intracellular calcium concentrations. Since calcium ions are crucial for smooth muscle contraction, their reduced availability leads to the relaxation of the smooth muscle and vasodilation. There is some evidence to suggest that levosimendan may also have beneficial effects on endothelial function, potentially leading to enhanced release of endothelium-derived relaxing factors, such as nitric oxide (NO) through p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), ERK and Akt pathways. Although this is not the primary mechanism of vasodilation induced by levosimendan, improved endothelial function can complement the overall vasodilatory effect of the drug in the cardiovascular system.26–28

Levosimendan has been shown to have cardioprotective effects by activating mitochondrial KATP channels, contributing to its efficacy in treating heart failure and cardiogenic shock.27,28 This protection mechanism involves several cellular and molecular pathways that collectively help to preserve mitochondrial function, reduce oxidative stress, and enhance cell survival under ischaemic conditions. Activation of mitochondrial KATP channels leads to potassium influx into the mitochondria, which helps maintain the mitochondrial membrane potential. This stabilisation is crucial for preserving mitochondrial function, including ATP production, especially during the reperfusion phase following ischaemic events which potentially occur during CS. In this case, maintaining ATP levels is vital for cell survival and function, as it ensures the energy supply for critical cellular processes.29

Furthermore, by stabilising the mitochondrial membrane potential, the activation of mitochondrial KATP channels also helps prevent calcium overload in mitochondria. Excessive calcium in mitochondria during reperfusion can trigger the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP), leading to cell death through necrosis or apoptosis. Thus, preventing calcium overload is crucial for cell survival.30 Activation of mitochondrial KATP channels has also been associated with an increase in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) at a level that does not cause damage but is sufficient to trigger protective signalling pathways. This mild increase in ROS can enhance antioxidant defences, making the heart more resistant to oxidative stress.31 Finally, activation of mitochondrial KATP channels can prevent the release of cytochrome C from mitochondria, a key event in the initiation of apoptosis. By inhibiting this release, the channels help prevent apoptosis, contributing to cell survival during and after ischaemic events.32

Distinct Pharmacological Profile of Levosimendan Shapes its Clinical Features

The distinct pharmacological profile of levosimendan significantly impacts haemodynamic parameters critical for managing HF and CS. Its dual mechanism of action sets it apart from traditional inotropic agents. Levosimendan’s positive inotropic effect is primarily attributed to its action on cTnC, increasing calcium sensitivity and, consequently, myocardial contractility without elevating intracellular calcium levels. This mechanism facilitates an increase in stroke volume and cardiac output, essential for reversing the low-output state observed in HF and CS patients.10 Studies have consistently shown that levosimendan administration leads to a significant improvement in these parameters, contributing to enhanced peripheral and organ perfusion.12 In addition to its inotropic effects, levosimendan exerts vasodilatory actions on both arterial and venous vessels. This reduces systemic vascular resistance (SVR), lowering afterload and further aiding in the improvement of cardiac output.33 The reduction in SVR also contributes to decreased myocardial oxygen demand, a vital aspect in managing patients with compromised cardiac function.13

The haemodynamic improvements induced by levosimendan are not just theoretical advantages but translate into meaningful clinical benefits. A previous study evaluated the haemodynamic effects of levosimendan on left and right ventricular function in patients with intractable CS following MI. The treatment was associated with a significant increase in cardiac index and enhanced right ventricular cardiac power index.34 In acute decompensated HF, treatment with dobutamine or levosimendan led to significant reductions in biomarkers like b-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), N-terminal pro BNP/ST2 (NT-proBNP/ST2), and an increase in glomerular filtration rate (GFR).35,36 Interestingly, improvement in haemodynamic parameters was only seen in those treated with levosimendan.35 By enhancing cardiac output and reducing afterload, levosimendan addresses the fundamental pathophysiological aspects of HF and CS, potentially leading to improved outcomes and reduced mortality.

Clinical Efficacy of Levosimendan versus Other Inotropic Agents

The management of CS often necessitates the use of inotropic agents to improve cardiac output and organ perfusion. Levosimendan has emerged as a novel agent with distinct advantages over traditional inotropes such as dobutamine, enoximone, dopamine, and norepinephrine. Levosimendan’s mechanism of action offers haemodynamic benefits without significantly increasing myocardial oxygen demand. This contrasts with the mechanisms of dobutamine and dopamine, which increase intracellular cAMP and may lead to heightened myocardial oxygen consumption (Table 2) and arrhythmic risks.10

Table 2: Comparison of Inotropic Agents by Clinical Properties and Haemodynamic Parameters

Article image
Download

In a study comparing levosimendan to enoximone in refractory CS complicating acute MI, it was found that levosimendan contributed to improved survival compared to enoximone (69% versus 37%, p=0.023), with levosimendan inducing higher cardiac index and lower cumulative values for catecholamines at 72 hours.37 Likewise, when compared to dobutamine, levosimendan improved cardiac power output better in acute MI patients who developed CS following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).38 Interestingly, long-term analysis on the same patients demonstrated no significant differences in long-term survival between both groups (p=0.24).39 The timeframe of outcome evaluation must be considered cautiously. The study revealed the superiority of levosimendan over dobutamine in improving haemodynamic function within 24 hours; however, 180-day analysis did not show the difference. Nevertheless, it is worth mentioning that the sample size was considered small and there was a difference in baseline coronary artery disease characteristics between both therapy groups.38,39

A critical analysis of survival rates in various studies reveals that levosimendan is associated with improved outcomes compared to dobutamine, particularly in patients with severe low-output HF. The LIDO study demonstrated a significant reduction (HR 0.57; 95% CI [0.34–0.95]; p=0.029) in mortality at 180 days in patients treated with levosimendan compared to those receiving dobutamine, highlighting a clear survival advantage of levosimendan over dobutamine in patients with severe HF.40 The SURVIVE trial further supports these findings, suggesting that levosimendan may lead to better survival rates compared to dobutamine.41 Moreover, levosimendan has shown a better safety profile, with fewer instances of tachyarrhythmias and ischaemia than dobutamine and dopamine (i.e. catecholamine-based inotropes), and unlike norepinephrine, it does not significantly increase afterload due to its vasodilatory effects.42,43 The vasodilatory effects of levosimendan also offer therapeutic advantages by improving renal perfusion and diuresis, a crucial aspect in managing CS patients with concomitant acute kidney injury.44,45

Finally, clinical trials and meta-analyses have also suggested a survival benefit associated with levosimendan compared to other inotropes, particularly in patients with severe HF and those undergoing cardiac surgery.10,40,46 The improved survival rates can be attributed to the unique haemodynamic effects of levosimendan, including enhanced cardiac output and reduced preload and afterload, without the detrimental increase in myocardial oxygen consumption observed with other inotropes. Haemodynamically, levosimendan also leads to reductions in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (Table 2), which are critical in the management of CS. These effects are achieved with a lower risk of tachycardia and arrhythmias compared to dobutamine and dopamine. The vasodilatory effect of levosimendan also distinguishes it from norepinephrine, which may increase afterload and worsen cardiac function in certain settings.47 In terms of safety, levosimendan has a favourable side-effect profile, particularly concerning arrhythmic risk and myocardial ischaemia. While dobutamine and dopamine can increase the risk of arrhythmias and norepinephrine can lead to significant vasoconstriction, levosimendan provides a balanced approach to inotropic support with fewer adverse effects.40,48–50

Clinical Usage in Various Specific Settings

Levosimendan has shown promising outcomes across a spectrum of cardiovascular emergencies and chronic conditions, extending its utility beyond the management of acute HF and CS. In the setting of AMI complicated by HF, levosimendan offers haemodynamic support by improving myocardial contractility and reducing preload and afterload, potentially mitigating the progression to CS. Studies have demonstrated the ability of levosimendan to improve outcomes in AMI patients, particularly when conventional inotropic support is insufficient or associated with adverse effects.10,51 Its cardioprotective effects, coupled with the ability to improve coronary flow and reduce MI size, have been shown by some animal studies. In dogs, levosimendan could reduce left ventricular (LV) infarction size from 24% ± 2% to 11% ± 2%.52 A study in an experimental pig model also demonstrated significant difference (p=0.03) in LV infarction size between the levosimendan group (12% ± 13%) and the control group (27% ± 15%).27

Several studies evaluated the effect of levosimendan on weaning patients from veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), typically used in severe cardiopulmonary failures like CS and during extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) following cardiac arrest. The analysis found that the levosimendan group had a significantly higher success rate of weaning from ECMO, with a reduced mortality rate at 28 or 30 days, although patients on levosimendan had longer durations of ECMO support.53–56 Likewise, a study investigating the adjuvant efficacy of levosimendan in patients with temporary ventricular-assisted devices (VADs) for CS demonstrated that immediate administration of levosimendan after VAD implantation significantly improved mean arterial pressure, reduced lactate levels, and enhanced arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen ratio. Furthermore, patients treated with levosimendan exhibited improved systolic function and pulmonary artery pressure, leading to a higher weaning rate and lower mortality rate at the 6-month follow-up compared to the control group.57

Nevertheless, an observational cohort study conducted on 200 adult patients with refractory CS undergoing VA-ECMO revealed that despite a longer ECMO duration in the levosimendan group, there was no significant difference in the rate of weaning failure, suggesting that levosimendan did not improve VA-ECMO weaning success in this patient population.58

On the other hand, traditional inotropics, such as dobutamine, have been broadly used in clinical practice; however, studies have found an increase in mortality due to myocardial ischaemia and arrhythmias.43 To the best of our knowledge, there is no study directly comparing levosimendan with other inotropics such as dobutamine in terms of weaning from VA-ECMO.

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) and takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM) represent specific clinical scenarios. Experimental studies have found that catecholamines, such as dobutamine, should be avoided in PPCM due to their teratogenicity.59 In this case, the unique action profile of levosimendan can be particularly beneficial. In PPCM, levosimendan has been shown to improve cardiac function and facilitate recovery of LV function.60 The ability of levosimendan to improve myocardial contractility without significantly increasing heart rate and oxygen consumption makes it an appealing option for PPCM patients, who may be vulnerable to the side-effects of traditional inotropes. Studies have shown that levosimendan can facilitate haemodynamic improvement and potentially aid in the recovery of ventricular function in PPCM.61 Similarly, in TCM, which involves transient LV apical ballooning typically triggered by emotional or physical stress, the usage of inotropic such as dobutamine could trigger vasospasm or catecholamine surge, which will potentially lead to adverse outcome or even induce the TCM itself.62,63

A study comparing levosimendan and dobutamine in the management of TCM found that the recovery of LV systolic function only occurred in levosimendan group.64 Levosimendan can also provide symptomatic relief and haemodynamic stabilisation, addressing the acute systolic dysfunction.13,65 Patients undergoing cardiac surgery, particularly those with pre-existing LV dysfunction, are at increased risk of low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) postoperatively. Levosimendan, administered preoperatively or intraoperatively, has been associated with improved postoperative cardiac function, reduced need for mechanical circulatory support, decreased incidence of LCOS, and even decreased mortality, compared to placebo, dobutamine or milrinone.10,66 When compared to dobutamine, levosimendan also shows better improvement in cardiac index, systolic volume index, NT-proBNP, and kidney function.67 Its ability to provide inotropic support without significantly increasing myocardial oxygen demand makes it an attractive option in this vulnerable patient population.

Haemodynamic improvement also extends beyond acute management, suggesting potential long-term benefits of levosimendan in HF management. The ability of levosimendan to improve cardiac function while minimising adverse effects also presents a compelling case for its use as a bridging therapy in patients awaiting more definitive interventions, such as mechanical circulatory support or transplantation. In addition, its vasodilatory properties can ameliorate pulmonary hypertension, a common complication in right HF and chronic HF conditions, offering symptomatic relief and improving clinical outcomes.12 The broad applicability of levosimendan across various clinical scenarios underscores its potential as a versatile therapeutic agent in cardiovascular medicine. Its efficacy in improving haemodynamic parameters and survival, coupled with a favourable safety profile, supports its use in carefully selected patients. Further research and randomised clinical trials are warranted to optimise its use, define its role in treatment protocols, and explore its benefits in other cardiovascular conditions.

Safety and Adverse Effects of Levosimendan

While levosimendan has shown significant promise in treating HF, CS, and other cardiovascular conditions, understanding its safety profile and potential adverse effects is crucial for optimising patient outcomes. Levosimendan is generally well-tolerated, with the most common adverse effects being hypotension and headache.

A meta-analysis of 25 randomised controlled trials found that the risk of headache or migraine and hypotension was higher at levosimendan compared to placebo or dobutamine.68 These effects are attributed to its vasodilatory action, which, while beneficial for reducing preload and afterload, can lead to symptomatic hypotension in some patients.12 Other reported side-effects include dizziness, nausea and an increase in heart rate, which are typically mild and transient. In addition, levosimendan administration also led to a significantly greater reduction in mean haemoglobin values compared to dobutamine.69 Serious adverse effects of levosimendan are rare, but may include severe hypotension and cardiac arrhythmias, including AF. These effects are more likely to occur in patients with underlying severe aortic stenosis or those receiving concurrent treatment with other vasodilators or negative chronotropic agents. Ventricular arrhythmias have been reported but are less common than with β-adrenergic agonists such as dobutamine.13 However, conflicting evidence exists concerning ventricular tachycardia (VT) events. The REVIVE study demonstrated a higher incidence of VT with levosimendan versus placebo, while the SURVIVE Study reported similar rates.17

When compared with other inotropic agents (Table 3), levosimendan exhibits a unique safety profile. Its mechanism of action, which does not rely on increasing intracellular calcium levels, may account for the lower incidence of arrhythmogenic effects compared to agents such as dobutamine or milrinone. In an in vitro study investigating the effects of levosimendan, milrinone and isoprenaline on human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes at hypothermic temperatures, milrinone and isoprenaline were found to significantly increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmias by increasing action potential triangulation. Remarkably, levosimendan did not increase triangulation and maintained contractile properties even at temperatures as low as 26°C. Therefore, levosimendan may be a safer option for inotropic treatment in hypothermic patients.70 Studies have also indicated that the risk of adverse renal effects is lower with levosimendan than with other inotropes, which is particularly relevant in HF patients, where renal function is a critical determinant of outcome.10

Table 3: Adverse Effects of Current Inotropes and Vasopressors

Article image
Download

Furthermore, levosimendan has been associated with a reduced need for mechanical circulatory support compared to dobutamine, suggesting its role in more effectively stabilising critically ill patients with fewer complications.12 Overall, levosimendan offers a comparatively safe alternative to traditional inotropic agents, with a side-effect profile that supports its use in specific patient populations. While its beneficial haemodynamic effects are clear, careful patient selection and monitoring are essential to mitigate the risks of hypotension and other adverse effects. Ongoing research and post-marketing surveillance will further clarify the safety of levosimendan, especially in comparison with other cardiovascular therapies.

Application of Levosimendan in Daily Clinical Practice

Considering the safety profile of levosimendan and its hypotension risk, an initial high-dose bolus of levosimendan alone is generally not recommended in patients with hypovolemia or low blood pressure at the beginning. It is only used once the immediate effect has been observed or the systolic blood pressure is adequate.71 Therefore, levosimendan alone is only used when SBP is >90 mmHg. Otherwise, a combination with other inotropic and vasopressor agents is most recommended.56

Several studies have demonstrated the clinical benefit of these combinations. The combination of vasoactive catecholamines and levosimendan has shown significant increase in cardiac index and decrease in systemic vascular resistance in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock.33 Combining levosimendan with inotropes such as dobutamine is also promising. The CTnC calcium sensitisation property in levosimendan and calcium intracellular concentration enhancement in dobutamine would be expected to generate great potentiation in their efficacy.72 The first study combining levosimendan and dobutamine for treating patients with severe cardiac failure has shown significant increase in cardiac index and significant decrease in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure within 24 hours of administration.73 Longer follow-up even revealed prolonged survival rates in patients with combination, as compared to dobutamine alone.74 Another randomised study in 89 patients with acute decompensated heart failure also demonstrated the superiority of the levosimendan-dobutamine combination group over the dobutamine-only group in terms of preventing MACE outcomes.75

Dosing Considerations and Monitoring Requirements

The dosing of levosimendan must be tailored to the individual patient’s clinical status and underlying cardiac function. Typically, a loading dose is followed by a continuous infusion, adjusted based on haemodynamic response and tolerance. Initiating therapy involves administering a loading dose (which is presently not advised for severely hypotensive patients) ranging from 6 μg/kg to 12 μg/kg over 10 minutes, followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 0.1 μg/kg/min. Adjustments to the continuous infusion rate can be made by decreasing it to 0.05 μg/kg/min, pausing it if the response is deemed too strong, or raising it to 0.2 μg/kg/min if the initial dose is well tolerated and a stronger haemodynamic effect is desired (Table 4).14 For PPCM patients and those undergoing cardiac surgery, careful dosing is crucial to avoid hypotension or excessive vasodilation, with some guidelines suggesting lower initial doses or omitting the loading dose in certain scenarios.12 Close monitoring of haemodynamic parameters, including blood pressure, heart rate and cardiac output, is essential during levosimendan therapy. In addition, electrolytes and renal function should be monitored due to the potential for hypotension and its effects on renal perfusion. For patients with PPCM, monitoring extends to assessing ventricular recovery through imaging and biomarkers. In the perioperative cardiac surgery setting, vigilance for signs of LCOS and arrhythmias is paramount, guiding the adjustment of levosimendan therapy and the management of fluid status and concomitant medications.

Table 4: Dosing of Several Inotropes and Vasopressors

Article image
Download

Future Perspectives

Recent research and ongoing trials are paving the way for the application of levosimendan in a broader array of cardiovascular conditions and patient populations. Emerging evidence suggests that levosimendan may benefit patients with right ventricular failure, septic shock, and advanced chronic HF, where conventional inotropic support options are limited or associated with significant adverse effects.76–81 Several clinical trials are currently underway to explore new indications for levosimendan. For instance, the LION-HEART study is evaluating the long-term use of intermittent levosimendan infusions in patients with advanced HF, aiming to assess its impact on hospitalisation rates and survival.74 Another area of active research is the use of levosimendan in paediatric populations, particularly in children with HF or undergoing cardiac surgeries, where its safety and efficacy parameters are being rigorously tested.82–84 Research is also focusing on identifying specific patient groups that may derive the most benefit from levosimendan therapy. This includes patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), where treatment options are currently limited, and patients with acute decompensation due to pulmonary embolism or acute renal failure. In the ZSF1 obese rat model of HfpEF, chronic treatment with the inodilator levosimendan improved effort tolerance, enhanced LV relaxation and diastolic compliance, and reduced hypertrophy and interstitial fibrosis. Acutely, levosimendan was found to decrease systemic arterial pressures and increase cardiac index. The results of this study suggest that levosimendan may be a promising therapeutic agent for HfpEF and warrants further clinical trials in a broad patient population.85 Next, the potential for levosimendan to improve renal perfusion and function presents an intriguing avenue for reducing the morbidity associated with acute kidney injury in HF patients. Also, technological advancements in drug delivery and monitoring are expected to enhance the clinical utility of levosimendan. Novel drug delivery systems, such as subcutaneous or oral formulations are under investigation, which could facilitate outpatient management of chronic HF patients and improve adherence to therapy. Additionally, integration with advanced haemodynamic monitoring techniques, along with the optimal dose and administration, needs to be explored further to maximise therapeutic benefits.

Conclusion

Levosimendan has emerged as a pivotal agent in the management of CS, offering significant haemodynamic benefits that extend beyond the limitations of traditional inotropic and vasopressor therapies. Its unique mechanism of action, which enhances myocardial contractility via calcium sensitisation and induces vasodilation through KATP channel opening, provides a balanced approach to improving cardiac output and reducing systemic vascular resistance without the detrimental increase in myocardial oxygen consumption often associated with other inotropes. Comparative studies have underscored the superior efficacy of levosimendan in improving survival rates, particularly in patients with severe HF and those undergoing high-risk cardiac surgeries. Its ability to improve haemodynamic parameters while exhibiting a favourable safety profile, especially in terms of reducing the incidence of arrhythmias and myocardial ischaemia, positions levosimendan as a valuable tool in the critical care setting. The integration of levosimendan in clinical practice has been supported by evidence demonstrating its benefits in specific patient populations, including those with acute MI, acute HF, PPCM and takotsubo cardiomyopathy, among others. Ongoing research and clinical trials are expected to further delineate its role across a broader spectrum of cardiovascular conditions, potentially expanding its indications and solidifying its place in treatment algorithms. As our understanding of the clinical utility of levosimendan deepens, its continued evaluation and integration into therapeutic strategies are essential for enhancing patient care and outcomes in the complex landscape of CS management.

References

  1. Kosaraju A, Pendela VS, Hai O. Cardiogenic Shock. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing, 2024.
  2. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1287–96. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  3. Fang M, Cao H, Wang Z. Levosimendan in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Med Intensiva 2018;42:409–15. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  4. Jentzer JC, van Diepen S, Barsness GW, et al. Cardiogenic shock classification to predict mortality in the cardiac intensive care unit. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:2117–28. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  5. Burkhoff D, Garan AR, Kapur NK. The SCAI cardiogenic shock staging system gets taken for a test drive. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:2129–31. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  6. Naidu SS, Baran DA, Jentzer JC, et al. SCAI SHOCK stage classification expert consensus update: a review and incorporation of validation studies: this statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), American Heart Association (AHA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in December 2021. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022;79:933–46. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  7. Reynolds HR, Hochman JS. Cardiogenic shock: current concepts and improving outcomes. Circulation 2008;117:686–97. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  8. van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, et al. Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017;136:e232–68. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  9. Hollenberg SM, Kavinsky CJ, Parrillo JE. Cardiogenic shock. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:47–59. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  10. Mehta RH, Leimberger JD, van Diepen S, et al. Levosimendan in patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 2017;376:2032–42. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  11. Ali JM, Abu-Omar Y. Complications associated with mechanical circulatory support. Ann Transl Med 2020;8:835. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  12. Pollesello P, Parissis J, Kivikko M, Harjola VP. Levosimendan meta-analyses: is there a pattern in the effect on mortality? Int J Cardiol 2016;209:77–83. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  13. Nieminen MS, Buerke M, Cohen-Solal A, et al. The role of levosimendan in acute heart failure complicating acute coronary syndrome: a review and expert consensus opinion. Int J Cardiol 2016;218:150–7. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  14. Grześk G, Wołowiec Ł, Rogowicz D, et al. The importance of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamic and repetitive use of levosimendan. Biomed Pharmacother 2022;153:113391. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  15. Jaguszewski MJ, Gasecka A, Targonski R, et al. Efficacy and safety of levosimendan and dobutamine in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiol J 2021;28:492–3. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  16. Szilagyi S, Pollesello P, Levijoki J, et al. Two inotropes with different mechanisms of action: contractile, PDE-inhibitory and direct myofibrillar effects of levosimendan and enoximone. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2005;46:369–76. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  17. Nieminen MS, Fruhwald S, Heunks LMA, et al. Levosimendan: current data, clinical use and future development. Heart Lung Vessel 2013;5:227–45.
    PubMed
  18. Toller W, Algotsson L, Guarracino F, et al. Perioperative use of levosimendan: best practice in operative settings. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2013;27:361–6. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  19. Salmenperä M, Eriksson H. Levosimendan in perioperative and critical care patients. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009;22:496–501. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  20. Eriksson HI, Jalonen JR, Heikkinen LO, et al. Levosimendan facilitates weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with impaired left ventricular function. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:448–54. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  21. Antila S, Sundberg S, Lehtonen LA. Clinical pharmacology of levosimendan. Clin Pharmacokinet 2007;46:535–52. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  22. Sandell EP, Hayha M, Antila S, et al. Pharmacokinetics of levosimendan in healthy volunteers and patients with congestive heart failure. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1995;26(Suppl 1):S57–62. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  23. Sorsa T, Heikkinen S, Abbott MB, et al. Binding of levosimendan, a calcium sensitizer, to cardiac troponin C. J Biol Chem 2001;276:9337–43. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  24. Haikala H, Nissinen E, Etemadzadeh E, et al. Troponin C–mediated calcium sensitization induced by levosimendan does not impair relaxation. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1995;25:794–801. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  25. Pathak A, Lebrin M, Vaccaro A, et al. Pharmacology of levosimendan: inotropic, vasodilatory and cardioprotective effects. J Clin Pharm Ther 2013;38:341–9. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  26. Grossini E, Molinari C, Caimmi PP, et al. Levosimendan induces NO production through p38 MAPK, ERK and Akt in porcine coronary endothelial cells: role for mitochondrial KATP channel. Br J Pharmacol 2009;156:250–61. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  27. Papp Z, Edes I, Fruhwald S, et al. Levosimendan: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications: consensus of experts on the mechanisms of action of levosimendan. Int J Cardiol 2012;159:82–7. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  28. Kersten JR, Montgomery MW, Pagel PS, Warltier DC. Levosimendan, a new positive inotropic drug, decreases myocardial infarct size via activation of KATP channels. Anesth Analg 2000;90:5–11. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  29. Garlid KD, Paucek P, Yarov-Yarovoy V, et al. Cardioprotective effect of diazoxide and its interaction with mitochondrial ATP-sensitive K+ channels: possible mechanism of ardioprotection. Circ Res 1997;81:1072–82. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  30. Hausenloy DJ, Duchen MR, Yellon DM. Inhibiting mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening at reperfusion protects against ischaemia–reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res 2003;60:617–25. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  31. Kevin LG, Novalija E, Stowe DF. Reactive oxygen species as mediators of cardiac injury and protection: the relevance to anesthesia practice. Anesth Analg 2005;101:1275–87. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  32. Javadov SA, Clarke S, Das M, et al. Ischaemic preconditioning inhibits opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pores in the reperfused rat heart. J Physiol 2003;549:513–24. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  33. Delle Karth G, Buberl A, Geppert A, et al. Hemodynamic effects of a continuous infusion of levosimendan in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock requiring catecholamines. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003;47:1251–6. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  34. Russ MA, Prondzinsky R, Carter JM, et al. Right ventricular function in myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: improvement with levosimendan. Crit Care Med 2009;37:3017–23. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  35. Cheko J, Patsalis N, Kreutz J, et al. The impact of positive inotropic therapy on hemodynamics and organ function in acute heart failure: a differentiated view. J Pers Med 2023;14:17. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  36. Zhang H, Jiang L, Fu R, et al. Safety and efficacy of levosimendan in patients with acute heart failure: a prospective, multicenter, and observational study. Chin J Emerg Med 2023:889–94.
  37. Fuhrmann JT, Schmeisser A, Schulze MR, et al. Levosimendan is superior to enoximone in refractory cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Crit Care Med 2008;36:2257–66. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  38. García-González MJ, Domínguez-Rodríguez A, Ferrer-Hita JJ, et al. Cardiogenic shock after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: effects of levosimendan compared with dobutamine on haemodynamics. Eur J Heart Fail 2006;8:723–8. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  39. Samimi-Fard S, García-González MJ, Domínguez-Rodríguez A, Abreu-González P. Effects of levosimendan versus dobutamine on long-term survival of patients with cardiogenic shock after primary coronary angioplasty. Int J Cardiol 2008;127:284–7. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  40. Follath F, Cleland JGF, Just H, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous levosimendan compared with dobutamine in severe low-output heart failure (the LIDO Study): a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet 2002;360:196–202. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  41. Mebazaa A, Nieminen MS, Packer M, et al. Levosimendan vs dobutamine for patients with acute decompensated heart failure: the SURVIVE randomized trial. JAMA 2007;297:1883–91. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  42. Girardis M, Bettex D, Bojan M, et al. Levosimendan in intensive care and emergency medicine: literature update and expert recommendations for optimal efficacy and safety. J Anesth Analg Crit Care 2022;2:4. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  43. Conti N, Gatti M, Raschi E, et al. Evidence and current use of levosimendan in the treatment of heart failure: filling the gap. Drug Des Dev Ther 2021;15:3391–409. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  44. Pan J, Yang Y-M, Zhu J-Y, Lu Y-Q. Multiorgan drug action of levosimendan in critical illnesses. BioMed Res Int 2019;2019:9731467. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  45. Zima E, Farmakis D, Pollesello P, Parissis JT. Differential effects of inotropes and inodilators on renal function in acute cardiac care. Eur Heart J Suppl 2020;22(Suppl D):D12–9. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  46. Ayala R, Gewehr DM, Godoi A, et al. Preoperative levosimendan in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2024;38:649–59. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  47. Hamzaoui O, Georger J-F, Monnet X, et al. Early administration of norepinephrine increases cardiac preload and cardiac output in septic patients with life-threatening hypotension. Crit Care 2010;14:R142. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  48. Follath F. Levosimendan in patients with low-output heart failure: lessons from the LIDO trial. Ital Heart J 2003;4(Suppl 2):34–8.
    PubMed
  49. Nieminen MS, Akkila J, Hasenfuss G, et al. Hemodynamic and neurohumoral effects of continuous infusion of levosimendan in patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1903–12. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  50. Mebazaa A, Barraud D, Welschbillig S. Randomized clinical trials with levosimendan. Am J Cardiol 2005;96(6 Suppl): G74–9. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  51. Sun X, Wei C, Li L, Qu C. Levosimendan improves cardiac function, hemodynamics, and body inflammation in patients with acute myocardial infarction and heart failure. Am J Transl Res 2023;15:5624–32.
    PubMed
  52. Tarkia M, Stark C, Haavisto M, et al. Effect of levosimendan therapy on myocardial infarct size and left ventricular function after acute coronary occlusion. Heart 2016;102:465–71. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  53. Liu Y, Zhang L, Yao Y, et al. Effects of levosimendan on the outcome of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Res Cardiol 2024;113:509–21. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  54. Gaisendrees C, Schlachtenberger G, Gerfer S, et al. The impact of levosimendan on survival and weaning from ECMO after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Artif Organs 2023;47:1351–60. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  55. Burgos LM, Seoane L, Furmento JF, et al. Effects of levosimendan on weaning and survival in adult cardiogenic shock patients with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Perfusion 2020;35:484–91. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  56. Chen Y-W, Lee W-C, Wu P-J, et al. Early levosimendan administration improved weaning success rate in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with cardiogenic shock. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022;9:912321. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  57. Wang Y-H, Hsu P-S, Tsai Y-T, et al. Levosimendan as adjuvant therapy for cardiogenic shock patients with temporary ventricular assist device. J Med Sci 2023;43:167–76. 
    Crossref
  58. Guilherme E, Jacquet-Lagrèze M, Pozzi M, et al. Can levosimendan reduce ECMO weaning failure in cardiogenic shock? A cohort study with propensity score analysis. Crit Care 2020;24:442. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  59. Bauersachs J, König T, van der Meer P, et al. Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of peripartum cardiomyopathy: a position statement from the heart failure association of the European Society of Cardiology study group on peripartum cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail 2019;21:827–43. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  60. Karner E, Keller H, Schäffl-Doweik L, et al. Postpartum cardiogenic shock with rapid recovery in a titin gene variant: the role of genetic predisposition in peripartum cardiomyopathy. Obstet Med 2023; epub ahead of press. 
    Crossref
  61. Labbene I, Arrigo M, Tavares M, et al. Decongestive effects of levosimendan in cardiogenic shock induced by postpartum cardiomyopathy. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2017;36:39–42. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  62. Hajsadeghi S, Rahbar MH, Iranpour A, et al. Dobutamine-induced takotsubo cardiomyopathy: a systematic review of the literature and case report. Anatol J Cardiol 2018;19:412–6. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  63. Ansari U, El-Battrawy I, Fastner C, et al. Clinical outcomes associated with catecholamine use in patients diagnosed with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2018;18:54. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  64. Righetti F, Parolini M, Castellano G. Levosimendan versus dobutamine in Tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy. Crit Care 2013;17(Suppl 2):227. 
    Crossref
  65. Orfanopoulos S, Angelopoulos E, Routsi C. Seizure-associated takotsubo syndrome complicated by cardiogenic shock and successfully treated with levosimendan: a case report. In: Pérez-Torres D, Martínez-Martínez M, Schaller SJ, eds. Best 2022 Clinical Cases in Intensive Care Medicine. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International, 2023; 353–9. 
    Crossref
  66. Elkotb Ghoniem MF, Ali NM, Kamal MM, et al. The effect of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate cardioplegia alone or combined with preoperative infusion of levosimendan on vasoactive inotropic score in patients with poor cardiac function undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Egypt J Anaesth 2024;40:89–95. 
    Crossref
  67. Guerrero-Orriach JL, Malo-Manso A, Ramirez-Aliaga M, et al. Renal and neurologic benefit of levosimendan vs dobutamine in patients with low cardiac output syndrome after cardiac surgery: clinical trial FIM-BGC-2014-01. Front Pharmacol 2020;11:1331. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  68. Gong B, Li Z, Wong PCY. Levosimendan treatment for heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2015;29:1415–25. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  69. Rocha De Almeida A, Carias De Sousa M, Congo K, Trinca M. Hematological effects of levosimendan therapy in patients with heart failure. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2023;30(Suppl 1):zwad125.246. 
    Crossref
  70. Selli AL, Ghasemi M, Watters T, et al. Proarrhythmic changes in human cardiomyocytes during hypothermia by milrinone and isoprenaline, but not levosimendan: an experimental in vitro study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2023;31:61. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  71. Papp Z, Agostoni P, Alvarez J, et al. Levosimendan efficacy and safety: 20 years of SIMDAX in clinical use. Card Fail Rev 2020;6:e19. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  72. De Luca L, Colucci WS, Nieminen MS, et al. Evidence-based use of levosimendan in different clinical settings. Eur Heart J 2006;27:1908–20. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  73. Nanas JN, Papazoglou PP, Terrovitis JV, et al. Hemodynamic effects of levosimendan added to dobutamine in patients with decompensated advanced heart failure refractory to dobutamine alone. Am J Cardiol 2004;94:1329–32. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  74. Comín-Colet J, Manito N, Segovia-Cubero J, et al. Efficacy and safety of intermittent intravenous outpatient administration of levosimendan in patients with advanced heart failure: the LION-HEART multicentre randomised trial. Eur J Heart Fail 2018;20:1128–36. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  75. Juguet W, Fard D, Faivre L, et al. Levosimendan plus dobutamine in acute decompensated heart failure refractory to dobutamine. J Clin Med 2020;9:3605. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  76. Ge Z, Gao Y, Lu X, et al. The association between levosimendan and mortality in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Emerg Med 2024;31:90–7. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  77. Ho S, Lew JWS, Chia YW. Right ventricular failure in pulmonary embolism: the forgotten chamber—when in trouble, go back to basics. In: Pérez-Torres D, Martínez-Martínez M, Schaller SJ, eds. Best 2022 Clinical Cases in Intensive Care Medicine. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International 2023; 273–83. 
    Crossref
  78. Guan Q, Zhang C, Li B, et al. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of levosimendan in the treatment of severe sepsis complicated with septic cardiomyopathy. Heart Surg Forum 2023;26:e609–20. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  79. Ma Z, Jin H, Liu F, et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of levosimendan on cardiac function and outcomes in patients with sepsis. Altern Ther Health Med 2023;29:668–73.
    PubMed
  80. Mangini F, Bruno E, Caramia R, et al. Effectiveness of levosimendan and role of cardiac magnetic resonance in cardiogenic shock due to COVID-19 related lymphocytic myocarditis in the course of viral sepsis. Arch Clin Cases 2023;10:32–8. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  81. Zangrillo A, Putzu A, Monaco F, et al. Levosimendan reduces mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Crit Care 2015;30:908–13. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  82. Mouton JB, Seban L, Tafer N, et al. 313 levosimendan in dilated cardiomyopathy and refractory cardiogenic shock in children. Arch Cardiovasc Dis Suppl 2011;3:103. 
    Crossref
  83. Kar SS. Pediatric cardiogenic shock: current perspectives. Arch Med Health Sci 2015;3:252. 
    Crossref
  84. Awad HA, Mahmoud MZ, Aboelwafa MS, et al. Levosmindan: a new step up in management in neonatal cardiogenic shock. QJM Int J Med 2020;113(Suppl 1):hcaa063.018. 
    Crossref
  85. Moreira-Costa L, Tavares-Silva M, Almeida-Coelho J, et al. Acute and chronic effects of levosimendan in the ZSF1 obese rat model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Pharmacol 2024;966:176336. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  86. Polyzogopoulou E, Arfaras-Melainis A, Bistola V, Parissis J. Inotropic agents in cardiogenic shock. Curr Opin Crit Care 2020;26:403–10. 
    Crossref | PubMed
  87. Amado J, Gago P, Santos W, et al. Cardiogenic shock: inotropes and vasopressors. Rev Port Cardiol 2016;35:681–95. 
    Crossref | PubMed
Previous Volume Article Next Volume Article