Poster

The Effects of Co-injecting Human iPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes/Pre-epicardial Cells into Cryoinjured Rat Hearts

Register or Login to View PDF Permissions
Permissions× For commercial reprint enquiries please contact Springer Healthcare: ReprintsWarehouse@springernature.com.

For permissions and non-commercial reprint enquiries, please visit Copyright.com to start a request.

For author reprints, please email rob.barclay@radcliffe-group.com.
Information image
Average (ratings)
No ratings
Your rating
Open Access:

This work is open access under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License which allows users to copy, redistribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work is cited correctly.

Objectives: Previously, pre-epicardial cells derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells successfully recapitulated important developmental effects, including the induction of cardiomyocyte proliferation and compaction in vitro. In this study, we tested the use of pre-epicardial cells (PECs) in cardiomyocyte (CM) therapy for cryoinjured rat hearts.

Materials and methods: Adult male Sprague Dawley rats (250–300g) were administered cyclosporin 3 days prior to surgery. All rats were intubated and underwent thoracotomy under general anaesthesia. Hearts were cryoinjured using a liquid nitrogen-cooled vanadium cryoprobe twice, with 30 seconds for each application. After 10 minutes, CMs (1×106) were injected perpendicularly into the affected ventricular area, towards the infarct border region, both with and without PECs (1×106). Sham-operated and untreated groups (PBS-treated) served as controls. Cardiac haemodynamics were measured using the Millar Pressure Volume System after 4 weeks. Differences between groups were determined using ANOVA and considered significant when p<0.05.

Results: The preliminary results showed that cryoinjury reduced the left ventricular ejection fraction to 48.2 ± 4.6% (n=5), compared to 77.7 ± 4.8% in the sham group (n=4, p=0.0065). CM and CM/PEC treatment improved the LVEF to 57.85 ± 5.8% and 57.5 ± 4.1% (n=6), respectively, but the difference was not significant compared to the untreated group after 4 weeks. Resting end-systolic elastance (Ees), which measures load-independent cardiac contractility, was improved in the CM-treated group (0.8 ± 0.4 mmHg/ml versus 0.3 ± 0.1 mmHg/ml in the untreated group, p=0.01). No significant difference was observed between the CM and CM/PEC groups.

Conclusion: Further in-depth assessments are required to examine the effects of pre-epicardial cells in cardiomyocyte therapy in vivo.